Motor Authority
Viknesh, this story is a bit confusing.
First you say that GM will produce an EpsilonII based product that will be slotted below the CTS and essentially replace the BLS. Fair enough.
However, then you go onto say that "will be bigger than its LaCrosse and Insignia cousins".
First of all, the LaCrosse and Insignia are both EpsilonII derived, but they are NOT the same size. The LaCrosse is larger than the Insignia as it uses a stretched and widend version of the EpsilonII platform.
Second of all, the CTS itself is rougnly the size of the A6, 5-Series and E-Class -- all of which are roughly the size of the Insignia itself (take a look at the specs!).
Something is WAY off here.
First you say that GM will produce an EpsilonII based product that will be slotted below the CTS and essentially replace the BLS. Fair enough.
However, then you go onto say that "will be bigger than its LaCrosse and Insignia cousins".
First of all, the LaCrosse and Insignia are both EpsilonII derived, but they are NOT the same size. The LaCrosse is larger than the Insignia as it uses a stretched and widend version of the EpsilonII platform.
Second of all, the CTS itself is rougnly the size of the A6, 5-Series and E-Class -- all of which are roughly the size of the Insignia itself (take a look at the specs!).
Something is WAY off here.